Digital Archives

Episcopal Press and News

Conversations about changing the church occupy Executive Council

Episcopal News Service – Linthicum Heights, Maryland. June 17, 2011 [061711-04]

Mary Frances Schjonberg

The question of how the Episcopal Church needs to change to fit into the reality of a changing world continued to occupy the church's Executive Council as it concluded its three-day meeting here.

The council met to "talk of hard financial issues and church decline and growth, to address elephants in the room, and to speak truth to one another in love," the members said in a letter to the church issued at the end of the meeting.

"We were attentive to structural matters, keeping in mind that well-functioning structures make mission more easily facilitated and supported," the letter said. "Again our surroundings reminded us that changing the direction of a big sea-going vessel can take more miles than we can currently see and more time than one might assume."

Council met June 15-17 at the Conference Center at the Maritime Institute.

Structural change was not the only subject on the council's agenda. It spent its entire final day in plenary session hearing committee and task force reports, and approving a series of resolutions. Among them were resolutions reiterating the church's support for the people and church in South Sudan in the face of increasing persecution and its support for a two-state solution in Israel/Palestine.

The discussions about change during this meeting have their roots in the council's decision in October 2009 to reorganize and expand the number of its standing committees. The theme of structural change came to the fore again during the last two council meetings, beginning with remarks made by Presiding Bishop Katharine Jefferts Schori at the October 2010 meeting as well as those by House of Deputies President Bonnie Anderson in February.

"We continue to work toward adaptive change rather than technical change," Jefferts Schori told the council in her closing remarks June 17. Calling it a "significant shift" in the council's attitude, she said "we have, to some degree, left the culture of fear and entered into a culture of the future."

Anderson said that "ever since we arrived [at the conference center], our energy and creative tension have been signaling to me that we're on the cusp of breaking through to authentic, creative change."

While the council may not yet have the right words and plans, Anderson said, "what we want to affirm to each other and say to the church is this: The church of the 21st century needs to become more nimble and responsive. We need to foster vibrant mission and ministry in local communities where it transforms people's lives and helps create the realm of God. And if we truly believe in this way of being the church, we need to realign our structure and budgets and staffing plans accordingly."

As one way to begin that work, the council instructed its newly formed executive committee to design and manage the process by which the council will develop a draft 2013-2015 budget. The committee, made up of Jefferts Schori, Anderson and six elected council members, was created in the revised by-laws that council had passed earlier in the day. (It also passed newly developed rules of order for its meetings.) The budget process will take into consideration the projections contained in a "long-range financial modeling" tool that was presented to council.

Council member and Finances for Mission Committee Chair Del Glover told the council that the tool's assumptions about future expenses, coupled with conservative income projections, show annual multi-million-dollar deficits from 2012 through 2015 and "growing to a substantial amount in 2021."

He cautioned that the deficit prediction in the tool "is not a forecast, but it's a tool which says unless you do something different, this could be the result."

Becky Snow, chair of the church's Standing Commission on the Structure of the Church, reported to the council about the results of a May 30-31 effort to begin coordinating the conversations going on in a number of the church's committees and commissions about strategic planning and possible changes in the structure and governance of the church. At council's request, Snow's commission gathered representatives from the joint standing committees on Program, Budget and Finance and Planning and Arrangements; the Standing Commission on Constitution and Canons; the Budgetary Funding Task Force the House of Deputies Committee on the State of the Church, and council's Governance and Administration for Mission, Finances for Mission and Strategic Planning committees, as well as Jefferts Schori, Anderson, General Convention Secretary and Episcopal Church Executive Officer Gregory Straub and Treasurer Kurt Barnes.

Snow told the council that her commission will eventually refine a draft report that she gave them June 17 and include it and its recommendations in its report to General Convention in 2012

The draft of the report, which was not released, suggests "three lenses for looking at structural issues," Snow said: subsidiarity (although she suggested there needs to be a better word for this that speaks to its sense of interdependence and mutual responsibility), structure and diversity.

Structure refers to the "bones" and the "scaffolding" on which the Episcopal Church is uniquely organized. That lens honors the role General Convention has in the church, "not because it is the place where most ministries are done but because it sets the framework for breadth of vision and flexibility in the whole church," Snow said.

She added that the members of the commission on structure do not think that the church's constitution and canons, or its structure, are the problem. "The problem is … the way people look at the canons," she said, noting that a careful study of the canons shows "they allow a lot of flexibility."

The diversity lens, Snow said, reflects what has been "one of our stated values for many years," and the church must "constantly re-examine" how to live into that value. She said the report suggests some possible ways in which the church could be "more creative" in overcoming hurdles and becoming truly more diverse.

In its letter to the church, council members said they "called one another to the work of examining not only budgets but also how we treat one another and the staff that supports our work."

"How do we create and honor the beloved community? How do we avoid losing our better selves, losing patience with one another in the midst of long days with everyone trying to do too much with limited resources and time?"

In other business, the council:

A summary list of all resolutions passed by council is available here.

The Executive Council carries out the programs and policies adopted by the General Convention, according to Canon I.4 (1)(a). The council is composed of 38 members, 20 of whom (four bishops, four priests or deacons and 12 lay people) are elected by General Convention and 18 (one clergy and one lay) by provincial synods for six-year terms, plus the Presiding Bishop and the President of the House of Deputies.